In the matter of Carbon Copies Composites Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1039
The orders should give effect to the findings in the Principal Judgment: Carbon Copies owned Property relating to the Aircraft created on or after 17 December 2018 and had an irrevocable licence to use such Property created before incorporation to the exclusion of Mr Hutchison, but no deed of transfer or further declarations of breach were necessary. Because the derivative claim and the misleading and deceptive conduct claim were substantial and separable, costs should be apportioned so that the Second Plaintiff pays the Second Defendant's costs of the misleading and deceptive conduct claim and the Second Defendant pays the First Plaintiff's costs of the balance of the proceedings....
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Corporations List; Consequential Orders / Consequential Orders and Costs Following Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders and costs orders made
- Legal Topics
- ['party/party Costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'calderbank Offers' 'derivative Claims' 'misleading and Deceptive Conduct Claim' 'company Property and Intellectual Property' 'fiduciary and Statutory Duties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Equity Corporations List; Consequential Orders / Consequential Orders and Costs Following Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the definition of Property in the orders should include qualifications or exclusions proposed by the Second Defendant.' "Whether declarations should be made as to Carbon Copies' ownership of Property created on or after 17 December 2018 and its licence in Property created before incorporation." 'Whether the Second Defendant should be ordered to execute a deed of transfer and licence.' 'Whether declarations of breach of fiduciary and statutory duties should be made.' 'What costs orders should be made where the First Plaintiff was substantially successful in the derivative claim and the Second Plaintiff was unsuccessful in the misleading and deceptive conduct claim.' 'Whether indemnity costs should be ordered by reason of Calderbank offers.']
Ratio Decidendi
The orders should give effect to the findings in the Principal Judgment: Carbon Copies owned Property relating to the Aircraft created on or after 17 December 2018 and had an irrevocable licence to use such Property created before incorporation to the exclusion of Mr Hutchison, but no deed of transfer or further declarations of breach were necessary. Because the derivative claim and the misleading and deceptive conduct claim were substantial and separable, costs should be apportioned so that the Second Plaintiff pays the Second Defendant's costs of the misleading and deceptive conduct claim and the Second Defendant pays the First Plaintiff's costs of the balance of the proceedings....
Court Disposition
Orders and costs orders made
Orders
- ['The Second Defendant is permanently restrained from accessing, downloading, transferring, interfering with, disclosing, disseminating, altering, removing, deleting, copying, using, or commercially exploiting the Property other than in his role as a director and for the purposes of Carbon Copies Composites Pty...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment