Remington v Welsbach Light Company of Australasia [1914] HCA 54

Remington v Welsbach Light Company of Australasia [1914] HCA 54

On the evidence, the plaintiffs were entitled to retain the injunction restraining the defendants from passing off their goods, but there was insufficient evidence to support the award of damages.

Parties
Appellants; Defendants: Remington and Another; Respondents; Plaintiffs: Welsbach Light Company of Australasia
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 October 1914
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria; Judgment of High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; judgment varied by omitting award of damages.
Legal Topics
Passing Off, Injunctions, Damages, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Trade Marks Passing Off Injunctions Damages Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Remington and Another

Appellants; Defendants

Welsbach Light Company of Australasia

Respondents; Plaintiffs

Procedural Posture

Appeal / On Appeal From Supreme Court of Victoria; Judgment of High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendants' use of the mark 'Australite' constituted passing off or trade mark infringement
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs were entitled to injunction and damages

Ratio Decidendi

On the evidence, the plaintiffs were entitled to retain the injunction restraining the defendants from passing off their goods, but there was insufficient evidence to support the award of damages.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; judgment varied by omitting award of damages.

Orders

  • Plaintiffs to retain injunction restraining defendants from passing off their metallic filament lamps as those of the plaintiffs except for 218 lamps in defendants' possession
  • Award of damages set aside