Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Globaltech Corporation Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] FCA 1806
The applicants' proposed orders are appropriate because the point at which a meaningful and informed election can be made is unlikely to be reached until after relevant statements and experts' reports are filed and served. Accordingly, the applicants should not yet be required to elect between damages and an account of profits.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Intellectual Property – Patent Infringement / Post Liability; Pre Election Between Damages and an Account of Profits
- Outcome
- Applicants' proposed orders granted; respondents to answer interrogatories and no immediate obligation for applicants to elect between damages or an account of profits.
- Legal Topics
- ['patent Infringement' 'damages' 'account of Profits' 'interrogatories' 'case Management Procedures']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Intellectual Property – Patent Infringement / Post Liability; Pre Election Between Damages and an Account of Profits
Legal Issues
- 1 ['When should applicants be required to elect between damages and an account of profits?' 'Are further interrogatories and discovery needed before requiring the election?']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants' proposed orders are appropriate because the point at which a meaningful and informed election can be made is unlikely to be reached until after relevant statements and experts' reports are filed and served. Accordingly, the applicants should not yet be required to elect between damages and an account of profits.
Court Disposition
Applicants' proposed orders granted; respondents to answer interrogatories and no immediate obligation for applicants to elect between damages or an account of profits.
Orders
- ['By 15 December 2020, the Respondents provide written answers to interrogatories set out in Annexure A.' 'On or before 4:00 pm AEDT on 10 March 2021, the Applicants file and serve any affidavits, including any expert evidence, on which they intend to rely in support of a claim for damages, expressly subject to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment