Speedy Gantry Hire Pty Ltd v Preston Erection Pty Ltd & Anor [1998] FCA 521

Speedy Gantry Hire Pty Ltd v Preston Erection Pty Ltd & Anor [1998] FCA 521

Leave to amend was refused because the proposed amendment was futile: the cross-claimants misapprehended the earlier reasons, which did not make construction of each module away from the site of first use essential to the invention; the essential feature was that, once constructed, the module is transportable and reusable without dismantling and re-erection.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 May 1998
Procedural Posture
Patent Action / Further Reasons for Judgment on Cross Claimants' Application for Leave to Amend Cross Claim
Outcome
Application for leave to amend the cross-claim refused.
Legal Topics
['patent Validity' 'fair Basis' 'ambiguity of Patent Claims' 'leave to Amend Cross Claim']
['patents' 'civil Procedure'] ['patent Validity' 'fair Basis' 'ambiguity of Patent Claims' 'leave to Amend Cross Claim']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Patent Action / Further Reasons for Judgment on Cross Claimants' Application for Leave to Amend Cross Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the cross-claimants should be granted leave to amend their cross-claim to contend that all claims of the Patent did not comply with sections 40(2) and 40(3) of the 1990 Act.' "Whether the proposed amendment was futile because it misapprehended the Court's earlier reasons about the essence of the Speedy Gantry invention."]

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to amend was refused because the proposed amendment was futile: the cross-claimants misapprehended the earlier reasons, which did not make construction of each module away from the site of first use essential to the invention; the essential feature was that, once constructed, the module is transportable and reusable without dismantling and re-erection.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to amend the cross-claim refused.

Orders

  • ['The application for leave to amend the cross-claim is refused.']