Angus & Julia Stone Pty Ltd v HNOE Limited [2024] NSWSC 627

Angus & Julia Stone Pty Ltd v HNOE Limited [2024] NSWSC 627

The defendants' application for summary dismissal and a permanent stay was refused because, although the plaintiff's pleadings were deficient, it could not be concluded to the requisite high degree of certainty that claims for breach of section 11 of the EI Act or restitution were doomed to fail. The court held the exclusive jurisdiction clause was effective as between parties but, since not all parties to the proceeding were bound by it and strong reasons were shown for litigation to proceed in NSW (notably the possible mandatory operation of NSW statute and lack of evidence the English forum would enforce it), a permanent stay was unjustified. Plaintiffs were given an opportunity to...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 May 2024
Procedural Posture
Application/notice of Motion / Interlocutory—summary Dismissal, Strike Out and Stay Applications
Outcome
Defendants' Notice of Motion for summary dismissal and permanent stay dismissed; plaintiffs granted leave to seek amendment; partial costs orders.
Legal Topics
['permanent Stay of Proceedings' 'exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses' 'summary Dismissal' 'strike Out' 'entertainment Industry Act 2013 (nsw)' 'interpretation of Statutory Remedies' 'restitution for Payments' 'breach of Statutory Duty']
['civil Procedure' 'contract Law' 'statutory Interpretation' 'restitution'] ['permanent Stay of Proceedings' 'exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses' 'summary Dismissal' 'strike Out' 'entertainment Industry Act 2013 (nsw)' 'interpretation of Statutory Remedies' 'restitution for Payments' 'breach of Statutory Duty']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application/notice of Motion / Interlocutory—summary Dismissal, Strike Out and Stay Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the claims under the Entertainment Industry Act 2013 (NSW) against defendants MMM and Mr Manton disclose a reasonable cause of action' 'Whether section 11 of the EI Act applies to conduct by an overseas performer representative under an agreement governed by foreign law' 'Whether a private cause of action for damages or restitution is available for contravention of section 11 of the EI Act' 'Whether claims are statute-barred in respect of payments made under the Manton Julia Agreement' 'Whether claims of the corporate plaintiffs for breach of statutory duty/disclosure are viable' 'Whether a permanent stay should be granted on the basis of an exclusive jurisdiction clause']

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants' application for summary dismissal and a permanent stay was refused because, although the plaintiff's pleadings were deficient, it could not be concluded to the requisite high degree of certainty that claims for breach of section 11 of the EI Act or restitution were doomed to fail. The court held the exclusive jurisdiction clause was effective as between parties but, since not all parties to the proceeding were bound by it and strong reasons were shown for litigation to proceed in NSW (notably the possible mandatory operation of NSW statute and lack of evidence the English forum would enforce it), a permanent stay was unjustified. Plaintiffs were given an opportunity to...

Court Disposition

Defendants' Notice of Motion for summary dismissal and permanent stay dismissed; plaintiffs granted leave to seek amendment; partial costs orders.

Orders

  • ['The Plaintiffs file any application for leave to amend the Summons and/or Commercial List Statement by 7 June 2024, such motion to be returnable on 14 June 2024.' 'The Notice of Motion filed by the Defendants on 15 March 2024 otherwise be dismissed.' "The Plaintiffs pay the costs of the Defendants' Notice of...