Goldsmith by her tutor the New South Wales Trustee and Guardian v Bisset [2016] NSWSC 353

Goldsmith by her tutor the New South Wales Trustee and Guardian v Bisset [2016] NSWSC 353

Because the appeal involved closely fought questions of primary fact, possible appellate reconsideration under Warren v Coombes principles, and a contentious interpretation of s 138 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), the outcome of the appeal was very uncertain. The certainty provided by the proposed settlement greatly outweighed that uncertainty, and the Court was affirmatively satisfied that the settlement was beneficial to the plaintiff, a person under legal incapacity. The settlement was therefore approved under s 76(3) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), leave to appeal was granted, and the liability orders were varied by consent.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal in a Motor Accidents Matter Involving Approval of Settlement for a Person Under Legal Incapacity / Application for Leave to Appeal and Approval of Settlement; Appeal Allowed in Part by Consent
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed in part by consent; settlement approved; earlier liability order set aside and replaced with findings of negligence and 20 per cent contributory negligence.
Legal Topics
['person Under Legal Incapacity' 'approval of Settlement' 'consent Judgments and Orders' 'contributory Negligence' 'separate Determination of Liability Issues']
['civil Procedure' 'motor Accidents' 'negligence'] ['person Under Legal Incapacity' 'approval of Settlement' 'consent Judgments and Orders' 'contributory Negligence' 'separate Determination of Liability Issues']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal in a Motor Accidents Matter Involving Approval of Settlement for a Person Under Legal Incapacity / Application for Leave to Appeal and Approval of Settlement; Appeal Allowed in Part by Consent

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court should approve the settlement of the appeal because the plaintiff was a person under a legal incapacity.' 'Whether the proposed compromise was beneficial to the interests of the plaintiff.' 'Whether leave to appeal should be granted and the liability orders varied by consent.' "Whether the plaintiff's injuries were caused by the negligence of the defendant." 'Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and, if so, to what extent.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the appeal involved closely fought questions of primary fact, possible appellate reconsideration under Warren v Coombes principles, and a contentious interpretation of s 138 of the Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW), the outcome of the appeal was very uncertain. The certainty provided by the proposed settlement greatly outweighed that uncertainty, and the Court was affirmatively satisfied that the settlement was beneficial to the plaintiff, a person under legal incapacity. The settlement was therefore approved under s 76(3) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), leave to appeal was granted, and the liability orders were varied by consent.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed in part by consent; settlement approved; earlier liability order set aside and replaced with findings of negligence and 20 per cent contributory negligence.

Orders

  • ['Grant Leave to Appeal.' 'Direct the Appellant to file a Notice of Appeal in accordance with the amended draft contained in the White Folder within 7 days of today and otherwise dispense with the requirement as to service.' 'Appeal allowed in part.' "Set aside order 1 pronounced on 29 May 2015 and instead order...