Fleming’s Nurseries Pty Ltd v Hannaford [2008] FCA 591

Fleming’s Nurseries Pty Ltd v Hannaford [2008] FCA 591

It is just and convenient, per established practice and authorities, to order that all issues of liability be determined at a separate trial prior to any trial of quantum of damages or account of profits, given likely savings in time and expense, the nature of intellectual property proceedings, and insufficient risk of prejudice to respondent's credit or overlap of evidence to outweigh the advantages.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Application / Cross Claim / Interlocutory Orders on Procedural Motion to Split Trial
Outcome
Interlocutory order granted to split trial—liability to be determined separately; costs ordered against first respondent.
Legal Topics
["plant Breeder's Rights" 'breach of Contract' 'penalties and Relief Against Forfeiture' 'litigation Procedure—split Trial' 'statute of Limitations']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application / Cross Claim / Interlocutory Orders on Procedural Motion to Split Trial

  1. 1 ["Whether Canada's rights under the Plant Breeder's Rights Act 1994 (Cth) have been infringed by the respondents" "Whether Mr Hannaford breached Non-Propagation Agreements with Fleming's Nurseries" 'Whether claims are barred by statute of limitations' "Whether Canada's rights under the PBRA are invalid and ought to be revoked" 'Whether terms in Non-Propagation Agreements constitute penalties and/or entitle Mr Hannaford to relief against forfeiture']

Ratio Decidendi

It is just and convenient, per established practice and authorities, to order that all issues of liability be determined at a separate trial prior to any trial of quantum of damages or account of profits, given likely savings in time and expense, the nature of intellectual property proceedings, and insufficient risk of prejudice to respondent's credit or overlap of evidence to outweigh the advantages.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory order granted to split trial—liability to be determined separately; costs ordered against first respondent.

Orders

  • ['There be decided at a separate trial all issues of liability in the proceedings, prior to any trial, if necessary, in respect of all issues of quantum of damages and/or account of profits.' "The first respondent pay the applicants' costs of the motion, notice of which is dated 7 February 2008."]