Fleming’s Nurseries Pty Ltd v Hannaford [2009] FCA 884

Fleming’s Nurseries Pty Ltd v Hannaford [2009] FCA 884

Having reviewed the pleadings and associated documents, the legislation, the confidential report, the parties' submissions and the respondent/cross-claimant's admissions and consent, the Court was satisfied that the applicants had a real interest in the declarations and that the declarations and orders were appropriate.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 August 2009
Procedural Posture
Plant Breeder's Rights and Contract Proceeding With Cross Claim / Consent Declarations and Orders After Settlement; Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment
Outcome
Declarations and orders made by consent upon the respondent/cross-claimant giving undertakings; the proceeding including the cross-claim was discontinued with a limited right of reinstatement.
Legal Topics
["plant Breeder's Rights Infringement" 'non Propagation Agreement' 'declaratory Relief' 'consent Orders' 'undertakings' 'discontinuance of Proceeding and Cross Claim']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Plant Breeder's Rights and Contract Proceeding With Cross Claim / Consent Declarations and Orders After Settlement; Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment

  1. 1 ["Whether the Court should make consent declarations that the respondent breached a Non Propagation Agreement and contravened the Plant Breeder's Rights Act 1994 (Cth)." 'Whether the applicants had a real interest in declaratory relief under s 21 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).' 'Whether the proposed orders and undertakings were appropriate in light of the pleadings, admissions and confidential report.']

Ratio Decidendi

Having reviewed the pleadings and associated documents, the legislation, the confidential report, the parties' submissions and the respondent/cross-claimant's admissions and consent, the Court was satisfied that the applicants had a real interest in the declarations and that the declarations and orders were appropriate.

Court Disposition

Declarations and orders made by consent upon the respondent/cross-claimant giving undertakings; the proceeding including the cross-claim was discontinued with a limited right of reinstatement.

Orders

  • ['The Court declared by consent that the term "propagating material" in the order does not include fruit of the varieties referred to in paragraph A, so that the respondent may sell fruit of properly acquired varieties not required to be removed and destroyed.' 'The Court declared by consent that the respondent...