Fleming’s Nurseries Pty Ltd v Hannaford [2009] FCA 884
Having reviewed the pleadings and associated documents, the legislation, the confidential report, the parties' submissions and the respondent/cross-claimant's admissions and consent, the Court was satisfied that the applicants had a real interest in the declarations and that the declarations and orders were appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Plant Breeder's Rights and Contract Proceeding With Cross Claim / Consent Declarations and Orders After Settlement; Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Declarations and orders made by consent upon the respondent/cross-claimant giving undertakings; the proceeding including the cross-claim was discontinued with a limited right of reinstatement.
- Legal Topics
- ["plant Breeder's Rights Infringement" 'non Propagation Agreement' 'declaratory Relief' 'consent Orders' 'undertakings' 'discontinuance of Proceeding and Cross Claim']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Plant Breeder's Rights and Contract Proceeding With Cross Claim / Consent Declarations and Orders After Settlement; Ex Tempore Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court should make consent declarations that the respondent breached a Non Propagation Agreement and contravened the Plant Breeder's Rights Act 1994 (Cth)." 'Whether the applicants had a real interest in declaratory relief under s 21 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).' 'Whether the proposed orders and undertakings were appropriate in light of the pleadings, admissions and confidential report.']
Ratio Decidendi
Having reviewed the pleadings and associated documents, the legislation, the confidential report, the parties' submissions and the respondent/cross-claimant's admissions and consent, the Court was satisfied that the applicants had a real interest in the declarations and that the declarations and orders were appropriate.
Court Disposition
Declarations and orders made by consent upon the respondent/cross-claimant giving undertakings; the proceeding including the cross-claim was discontinued with a limited right of reinstatement.
Orders
- ['The Court declared by consent that the term "propagating material" in the order does not include fruit of the varieties referred to in paragraph A, so that the respondent may sell fruit of properly acquired varieties not required to be removed and destroyed.' 'The Court declared by consent that the respondent...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment