Perazzoli v BankSA (No 5) [2018] FCA 1187
Leave to amend the Second Amended Originating Application and Second Amended Statement of Claim was refused because proposed pleadings regarding contractual engagements, fiduciary duties, and fraud were inadequately particularised, embarrassing or likely to cause prejudice, and/or failed to fulfil the necessary requirements under the Court's rules and Part IVA regime. Applicants were granted liberty to amend in a different form, but not in the terms proposed.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Galliano Perazzoli; Second Applicant: Moreno Ferluga; Third Applicant: William Johnson; First Respondent: BankSA, a Division of Westpac Banking Corporation Limited ABN 33 007 141; Second Respondent: Michael Christopher Samra; Third Respondent: Michael Christopher Samra as trustee of the Michael Christopher Samra Family Trust trading as Adelaide Lending Centre ABN 69 787 153 821; Fourth Respondent: Adelaide Lending Centre Group Pty Ltd (in liquidation) ACN 088 613 156
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application (interlocutory) for Leave to Amend / Interlocutory Judgment Prior to Trial
- Outcome
- Leave to amend refused in proposed form; liberty to propose further amendments in different form; joinder and disjoinder of parties ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Pleading Requirements, Representative Proceedings, Amendment of Originating Process, Equitable Claims, Fiduciary Duties, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Banker Liability, Constructive Trusts, Knowledge in Barnes V Addy Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Galliano Perazzoli
First Applicant
Moreno Ferluga
Second Applicant
William Johnson
Third Applicant
BankSA, a Division of Westpac Banking Corporation Limited ABN 33 007 141
First Respondent
Michael Christopher Samra
Second Respondent
Michael Christopher Samra as trustee of the Michael Christopher Samra Family Trust trading as Adelaide Lending Centre ABN 69 787 153 821
Third Respondent
Adelaide Lending Centre Group Pty Ltd (in liquidation) ACN 088 613 156
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application (interlocutory) for Leave to Amend / Interlocutory Judgment Prior to Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant leave to applicants to amend originating application and statement of claim in a representative proceeding
- 2 Whether proposed pleadings meet requirements of specificity, particularly in fraud and fiduciary duty allegations
- 3 Whether group members' claims are sufficiently pleaded and identified
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend the Second Amended Originating Application and Second Amended Statement of Claim was refused because proposed pleadings regarding contractual engagements, fiduciary duties, and fraud were inadequately particularised, embarrassing or likely to cause prejudice, and/or failed to fulfil the necessary requirements under the Court's rules and Part IVA regime. Applicants were granted liberty to amend in a different form, but not in the terms proposed.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend refused in proposed form; liberty to propose further amendments in different form; joinder and disjoinder of parties ordered.
Orders
- Applicants have leave to join Antonietta Perazzoli, Susan Ferluga and Renato Ferluga as Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Applicants respectively.
- William Johnson is disjoined as Third Applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment