Peter Davis & Ors v Halliday Financial Management Pty Limited & Ors [2014] NSWSC 1371
Alleging only actual knowledge without pleading further material facts is insufficient to sustain a claim for accessorial liability; material facts from which such knowledge is to be inferred must be pleaded to fairly inform the defendants of the case they have to answer.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Applications / Application to Strike Out Pleadings
- Outcome
- Statement of claim struck out in part with leave to replead
- Legal Topics
- ['pleadings' 'accessorial Liability' 'material Facts' 'particularity in Pleadings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Applications / Application to Strike Out Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the allegations of actual knowledge in the proposed amended statement of claim are pleaded with sufficient particularity to support claims of accessorial liability under ASIC Act s 12DA and Australian Consumer Law s 18.']
Ratio Decidendi
Alleging only actual knowledge without pleading further material facts is insufficient to sustain a claim for accessorial liability; material facts from which such knowledge is to be inferred must be pleaded to fairly inform the defendants of the case they have to answer.
Court Disposition
Statement of claim struck out in part with leave to replead
Orders
- ['Relevant paragraphs of the proposed amended statement of claim struck out' 'Leave to replead granted to the plaintiffs' "Plaintiffs to pay the defendants' costs of the motions" 'Parties to bring in short minutes of order to give effect to reasons and timetable further pleading']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment