Cohen v Double Bay Bowling Club (No 3) [2021] NSWSC 295
Leave to amend was refused because the proposed amendments failed to plead duties and alleged breaches with sufficient particularity; the deficiencies included unspecified factual bases, lack of clear identification of which statutory duties and breaches applied to each defendant, and overly general references to expert reports instead of direct allegations.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Technology and Construction List / Application for Leave to Amend Pleading
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['pleadings' 'amendment' 'duty of Care' 'breach of Duty']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Technology and Construction List / Application for Leave to Amend Pleading
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend the Technology and Construction List Statement' 'Whether the proposed amendments are pleaded with sufficient particularity, specifically regarding duties and breaches']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend was refused because the proposed amendments failed to plead duties and alleged breaches with sufficient particularity; the deficiencies included unspecified factual bases, lack of clear identification of which statutory duties and breaches applied to each defendant, and overly general references to expert reports instead of direct allegations.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- ["Plaintiffs' notice of motion of 26 February 2021 dismissed with costs" 'Costs may be assessed forthwith and are to be payable forthwith on assessment' 'If plaintiffs wish to further amend their List Statement, they should file and serve a notice of motion seeking leave by 5pm on 14 April 2021' 'Such motion should...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment