Reliance Financial Services Pty Ltd v Antalija Developments No 4 Pty Ltd (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 141
The application to amend and join an additional defendant was made unjustifiably late, after the matter was ready to be set for hearing, and would cause unjustifiable unfairness to the existing defendants by delaying final resolution; essential facts justifying the proposed claim were known much earlier to the applicants.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff: Reliance Financial Services Pty Ltd; Second Plaintiff: Nancy Morvillo; Third Plaintiff: Marginata Securities Pty Ltd; Fourth Plaintiff: Accolade Advisory Pty Ltd; First Defendant: Antalija Developments No 4 Pty Ltd; Second Defendant: Antalija Constructions Pty Ltd; Third Defendant: Dennis Katavic; Fourth Defendant: Jocelyn Katavic; Fifth Defendant: Sue Price-Arcidiacono; Sixth Defendant: Westpac Banking Corporation; Seventh Defendant: Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue; Eighth Defendant: Altair Investments Pty Ltd; Ninth Defendant: Xi He
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion—application for Leave to Amend Pleadings and Join Defendant / Decision on Interlocutory Application; Post Mediation, Pre Hearing of Separate Question
- Outcome
- Plaintiffs' motion to amend pleadings and join Mr Gulan as defendant dismissed; adverse costs order
- Legal Topics
- Pleadings, Amendment of Pleadings, Joinder of Parties, Fiduciary Duties, Mortgagee Sale—surplus Distribution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Reliance Financial Services Pty Ltd
First Plaintiff
Nancy Morvillo
Second Plaintiff
Marginata Securities Pty Ltd
Third Plaintiff
Accolade Advisory Pty Ltd
Fourth Plaintiff
Antalija Developments No 4 Pty Ltd
First Defendant
Antalija Constructions Pty Ltd
Second Defendant
Dennis Katavic
Third Defendant
Jocelyn Katavic
Fourth Defendant
Sue Price-Arcidiacono
Fifth Defendant
Westpac Banking Corporation
Sixth Defendant
Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue
Seventh Defendant
Altair Investments Pty Ltd
Eighth Defendant
Xi He
Ninth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion—application for Leave to Amend Pleadings and Join Defendant / Decision on Interlocutory Application; Post Mediation, Pre Hearing of Separate Question
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant leave to the plaintiffs to amend the statement of claim and join Mr Gulan as the tenth defendant
- 2 Timeliness and justification for the late amendment and joinder
- 3 Whether allowing the amendment would cause unfairness or prejudice to existing defendants
Ratio Decidendi
The application to amend and join an additional defendant was made unjustifiably late, after the matter was ready to be set for hearing, and would cause unjustifiable unfairness to the existing defendants by delaying final resolution; essential facts justifying the proposed claim were known much earlier to the applicants.
Court Disposition
Plaintiffs' motion to amend pleadings and join Mr Gulan as defendant dismissed; adverse costs order
Orders
- The plaintiffs' notice of motion filed on 8 April 2022 is dismissed.
- The plaintiffs must pay the eighth and ninth defendants' costs as respondents to the notice of motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment