Midland Metals Overseas PTE Ltd v Australian Cablemakers Association Ltd [2017] NSWCA 265
Although the point was finely balanced, the 28 April communications, considered as a whole and in their pleaded context, were capable of giving rise to the twelfth representation. The issue was not whether the representation was actually made, but whether it was so untenable that it should be struck out. Given the contextual matters, the purpose of urging government investigation of Midland Metals' product, and the prospect of a trial on other representations, the General Steel threshold was not met and the pleaded issue should go to trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal in Civil Proceedings Concerning Pleadings and Alleged Misleading or Deceptive Conduct / Court of Appeal From Interlocutory Orders Striking Out a Pleaded Representation and Refusing Amendment
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- ['pleadings' 'strike Out' 'leave to Amend' 'misleading or Deceptive Conduct' 'implied Representations' 'australian Consumer Law S 18']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal in Civil Proceedings Concerning Pleadings and Alleged Misleading or Deceptive Conduct / Court of Appeal From Interlocutory Orders Striking Out a Pleaded Representation and Refusing Amendment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the alleged twelfth representation was capable of being conveyed by the 28 April communications and attached test report in context.' 'Whether the primary judge erred in striking out the pleaded representation and refusing leave to amend the Commercial List Statement.' 'Whether the General Steel standard for striking out was satisfied.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the point was finely balanced, the 28 April communications, considered as a whole and in their pleaded context, were capable of giving rise to the twelfth representation. The issue was not whether the representation was actually made, but whether it was so untenable that it should be struck out. Given the contextual matters, the purpose of urging government investigation of Midland Metals' product, and the prospect of a trial on other representations, the General Steel threshold was not met and the pleaded issue should go to trial.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'The applicant is directed to file within seven days a notice of appeal in accordance with the draft in the white folder, and the other requirements as to service in the rules are dispensed with.' 'The appeal is allowed and the orders made on 21 April 2017 are set aside.' 'In lieu of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment