Kirela Pty Limited v Westfield Holdings Limited [2002] FCA 1223
The amended statement of claim failed to adequately plead a causal connection between the respondents' allegedly wrongful conduct (particularly the covert campaign) and the loss and damage suffered, or any basis for estoppel by convention, warranting the striking out of paragraph 83 but allowing the applicants leave to amend their pleading.
- Parties
- First Applicant: Kirela Pty Limited (ACN 079 721 127); Second Applicant: Jagar Holdings Pty Ltd (ABN 29059 598 551); First Respondent: Westfield Holdings Limited (ACN 001 671 496); Second Respondent: Westfield Management Limited (ACN 001 670 579) as Trustee of Westfield Trust; Third Respondent: Westfield Limited (ACN 000 372 79); Fourth Respondent: Westfield Developments Pty Ltd (ACN 001 134 676); Fifth Respondent: Robert Jordan; Sixth Respondent: Andrew Whiteside; Seventh Respondent: Jeffrey Breen; Eighth Respondent: Hooper Communications Pty Ltd (ACN 060 554 805); Ninth Respondent: Kenneth Francis Hooper
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Motion to Strike Out Pleadings / Interlocutory (pleadings; Motion to Strike Out Amended Statement of Claim)
- Outcome
- Paragraph 83 of the amended statement of claim struck out; leave to further amend granted.
- Legal Topics
- Pleadings, Causation, Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Estoppel by Convention, Strike Out Applications
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kirela Pty Limited (ACN 079 721 127)
First Applicant
Jagar Holdings Pty Ltd (ABN 29059 598 551)
Second Applicant
Westfield Holdings Limited (ACN 001 671 496)
First Respondent
Westfield Management Limited (ACN 001 670 579) as Trustee of Westfield Trust
Second Respondent
Westfield Limited (ACN 000 372 79)
Third Respondent
Westfield Developments Pty Ltd (ACN 001 134 676)
Fourth Respondent
Robert Jordan
Fifth Respondent
Andrew Whiteside
Sixth Respondent
Jeffrey Breen
Seventh Respondent
Hooper Communications Pty Ltd (ACN 060 554 805)
Eighth Respondent
Kenneth Francis Hooper
Ninth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Motion to Strike Out Pleadings / Interlocutory (pleadings; Motion to Strike Out Amended Statement of Claim)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants adequately pleaded a causal connection between respondents' conduct and the alleged loss under ss 52, 82 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
- 2 Whether paragraph 83 properly pleaded estoppel by convention
- 3 Whether leave to amend should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The amended statement of claim failed to adequately plead a causal connection between the respondents' allegedly wrongful conduct (particularly the covert campaign) and the loss and damage suffered, or any basis for estoppel by convention, warranting the striking out of paragraph 83 but allowing the applicants leave to amend their pleading.
Court Disposition
Paragraph 83 of the amended statement of claim struck out; leave to further amend granted.
Orders
- Paragraph 83 of the amended statement of claim be struck out.
- Leave be granted to the applicants to further amend their statement of claim within twenty-one days of the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment