MJJK Investments Pty Ltd acting as trustee for the Martha Kennedy Family Trust v Kennedy; Kennedy v MJJK Investments Pty Ltd acting as trustee for the Martha Kennedy Family Trust [2024] NSWSC 1398
Leave to amend the Summons is granted as the case the plaintiffs wish to pursue is different in substance from that pleaded and dismissing would cause extra costs and delay; leave is declined for the List Statement in its current proposed form as it does not properly plead the new case.
- Parties
- First Plaintiff/cross Defendant: MJJK Investments Pty Ltd acting as trustee for the Martha Kennedy Family Trust; Second Plaintiff/cross Defendant: MJJK Investments No. 2 Pty Ltd acting as trustee for the Martha Kennedy Family Trust No. 2; Third Plaintiff/cross Defendant: MJJK Investments No. 3 Pty Ltd acting as trustee for the Martha Kennedy Family Trust No. 3; Fourth Plaintiff/cross Defendant: Martha Kennedy; Fifth Plaintiff/cross Defendant: Justin Kennedy; First Defendant/cross Claimant: James Kennedy; Second Defendant/cross Claimant: Aberdeen Bear Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (equity Commercial List) / Procedural Ruling: Leave to Amend Pleadings and Case Management
- Outcome
- Leave to amend Summons granted; leave to amend List Statement in proposed form refused; further directions ordered; costs ordered against plaintiffs.
- Legal Topics
- Pleadings, Amendment of Pleadings, Specific Performance, Void Penalty Clause
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MJJK Investments Pty Ltd acting as trustee for the Martha Kennedy Family Trust
First Plaintiff/cross Defendant
MJJK Investments No. 2 Pty Ltd acting as trustee for the Martha Kennedy Family Trust No. 2
Second Plaintiff/cross Defendant
MJJK Investments No. 3 Pty Ltd acting as trustee for the Martha Kennedy Family Trust No. 3
Third Plaintiff/cross Defendant
Martha Kennedy
Fourth Plaintiff/cross Defendant
Justin Kennedy
Fifth Plaintiff/cross Defendant
James Kennedy
First Defendant/cross Claimant
Aberdeen Bear Pty Ltd
Second Defendant/cross Claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil (equity Commercial List) / Procedural Ruling: Leave to Amend Pleadings and Case Management
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiffs should be given leave to amend their Summons and List Statement at the hearing date
- 2 Whether the alternative would be to dismiss the proceedings
- 3 Whether the claim for $3 million as a debt is maintainable
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend the Summons is granted as the case the plaintiffs wish to pursue is different in substance from that pleaded and dismissing would cause extra costs and delay; leave is declined for the List Statement in its current proposed form as it does not properly plead the new case.
Court Disposition
Leave to amend Summons granted; leave to amend List Statement in proposed form refused; further directions ordered; costs ordered against plaintiffs.
Orders
- Grant leave to the plaintiffs to amend their Summons in accordance with MFI 1.
- Refuse leave to file further Amended Commercial List Statement in the form proposed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment