Collier v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2011] NSWCA 202
Non-compliance with s 192(2) does not of itself invalidate a guilty plea, and the plea entered by the legal practitioner on behalf of Mrs Collier was a sufficient unequivocal acknowledgment of guilt referable to charges understood by both the practitioner and accused; the requirements for procedural fairness and natural justice were also met, and there was no error of law in refusing leave to withdraw the guilty plea.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- summons dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['plea of Guilty' 'procedural Fairness' 'judicial Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What is required for an effective plea of guilty to a summary offence?' 'Whether the primary judge erred in law in determining that a guilty plea had been entered in these circumstances.' 'Whether s 192(2) invalidates a plea made in circumstances where the charges are not formally and separately stated in court prior to the plea being entered.' 'Whether procedural fairness or natural justice had been denied to the plaintiff by the primary judge or the magistrate.']
Ratio Decidendi
Non-compliance with s 192(2) does not of itself invalidate a guilty plea, and the plea entered by the legal practitioner on behalf of Mrs Collier was a sufficient unequivocal acknowledgment of guilt referable to charges understood by both the practitioner and accused; the requirements for procedural fairness and natural justice were also met, and there was no error of law in refusing leave to withdraw the guilty plea.
Court Disposition
summons dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['Summons dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment