Evans v Turner [2005] NSWSC 624
The dismissal of the plaintiffs' claim was based on the facts that there was no breach of any implied obligation by the lessors, who had a statutory right to seek the Board's opinion on their financial interest, no circumstances of unconscionability to support a constructive trust, and the evidence did not establish that the lessors' conduct prevented the sale of poker machine entitlements.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Property/equity Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Lessees' claim to relief dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['poker Machine Entitlements' 'landlord and Tenant' 'constructive Trust' 'lease Obligations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Property/equity Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether lessors breached an implied term of the lease or trust obligation in refusing to support transfer of poker machine entitlements' 'Whether a constructive or resulting trust arose in favour of the lessees regarding the poker machine entitlements']
Ratio Decidendi
The dismissal of the plaintiffs' claim was based on the facts that there was no breach of any implied obligation by the lessors, who had a statutory right to seek the Board's opinion on their financial interest, no circumstances of unconscionability to support a constructive trust, and the evidence did not establish that the lessors' conduct prevented the sale of poker machine entitlements.
Court Disposition
Lessees' claim to relief dismissed with costs
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment