R v AD [2012] NSWDC 273
The accused's intellectual and physical disabilities reduced the weight of some sentencing considerations and made custody more onerous, but his prior sexual offending against children, limited insight, commission of offences while on conditional liberty, provision of cannabis to the child victim, coercion with a knife for count five, and assessed high risk of sexual recidivism required substantial weight to specific deterrence and protection of the community. Counts one and two were at the lower end of objective seriousness for their offence type, while count five was at least mid-range. A 12.5 per cent discount for the guilty pleas was appropriate because of the accused's intellectual...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Guilty Pleas on Indictment and Proceedings for Breach of S 12 Bond
- Outcome
- The s 12 bond was revoked and the accused was sentenced to an effective total term of imprisonment of 4 years 11 months and 7 days, with an effective non-parole period of 3 years.
- Legal Topics
- ['possession of Child Pornography Material' 'use of Carriage Service to Transmit Child Pornography Material' 'acts of Indecency on a Child Under 16' 'incitement to Perform Act of Indecency for Producing Child Abuse Material' 'intellectual Disability and Sentencing' 'breach of Suspended Sentence Bond' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence Following Guilty Pleas on Indictment and Proceedings for Breach of S 12 Bond
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentences should be imposed for the five offences on the indictment and for the breach of the s 12 bond.' "How the accused's intellectual and physical disabilities affected moral culpability, general deterrence, hardship in custody and specific deterrence." "Whether the accused's risk of sexual reoffending required greater weight to personal deterrence and protection of the community." 'What discount should be allowed for the utilitarian value of the guilty pleas.' 'How totality and concurrency or accumulation should be applied across the offences.']
Ratio Decidendi
The accused's intellectual and physical disabilities reduced the weight of some sentencing considerations and made custody more onerous, but his prior sexual offending against children, limited insight, commission of offences while on conditional liberty, provision of cannabis to the child victim, coercion with a knife for count five, and assessed high risk of sexual recidivism required substantial weight to specific deterrence and protection of the community. Counts one and two were at the lower end of objective seriousness for their offence type, while count five was at least mid-range. A 12.5 per cent discount for the guilty pleas was appropriate because of the accused's intellectual...
Court Disposition
The s 12 bond was revoked and the accused was sentenced to an effective total term of imprisonment of 4 years 11 months and 7 days, with an effective non-parole period of 3 years.
Orders
- ['For the breach of the s 12 bond, the bond was revoked, the accused was convicted, and he was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment commencing 23 March 2010 and expiring 22 March 2011.' 'For counts three and four, the accused was sentenced to 1 year, 5 months and 2 weeks imprisonment on each count, concurrent with...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment