Cisera v Cisera Holdings Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCA 286
Re Dion Investments Pty Ltd was correctly decided and applied. The orders sought, although framed as authorising the trustee to manage and administer trust property beyond the Terminal Date, were in substance an application to vary the terms of the trust by varying the definition of the Terminal Date. Such an order is not a specific power relating to the management or administration of trust property within s 81(1) of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW), and therefore was not authorised. In any event, there was no proper basis to interfere with the primary judge's assessment that the orders were not expedient having regard to the Trust's objectives and the settlor's intentions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Concerning Trustee Powers Under Trustee Act 1925 (nsw) S 81 / Court of Appeal From Orders of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Equity Division, Dismissing the Applicants' Summons
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['powers of Trustees' 'statutory Jurisdiction to Confer Powers on Trustees' 'extension of Vesting Date of Trust' 'trustee Act 1925 (nsw) S 81' 'expediency in Management or Administration of Trust Property']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal and Appeal Concerning Trustee Powers Under Trustee Act 1925 (nsw) S 81 / Court of Appeal From Orders of the Supreme Court of New South Wales, Equity Division, Dismissing the Applicants' Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Re Dion Investments Pty Ltd (2014) 87 NSWLR 753; [2014] NSWCA 367 was wrongly decided.' 'Whether Re Dion Investments Pty Ltd was distinguishable so that s 81 of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW) authorised orders extending, or permitting the trustee to extend, the vesting date of the Cisera Family Trust.' 'Whether the proposed orders would be expedient in the management or administration of the trust property.']
Ratio Decidendi
Re Dion Investments Pty Ltd was correctly decided and applied. The orders sought, although framed as authorising the trustee to manage and administer trust property beyond the Terminal Date, were in substance an application to vary the terms of the trust by varying the definition of the Terminal Date. Such an order is not a specific power relating to the management or administration of trust property within s 81(1) of the Trustee Act 1925 (NSW), and therefore was not authorised. In any event, there was no proper basis to interfere with the primary judge's assessment that the orders were not expedient having regard to the Trust's objectives and the settlor's intentions.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Grant the applicants leave to appeal from the orders of the Equity Division of 20 July 2017.' 'The appeal be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment