Regina v M.B. No. 2 [2006] NSWSC 1163

Regina v M.B. No. 2 [2006] NSWSC 1163

The Crown did not establish that publishing the offender's name was in the interests of justice or that the interests of justice outweighed the potential prejudice to the offender. The general legislative intent is to protect juveniles' identities to aid their rehabilitation and reintegration. None of the Crown's arguments justified departing from that intent in this case.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
10 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Publication Order Following Sentencing
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
['practice and Procedure' 'publication of Names of Offenders' 'sentencing of Juveniles']
['criminal Law' 'children Law'] ['practice and Procedure' 'publication of Names of Offenders' 'sentencing of Juveniles']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Application for Publication Order Following Sentencing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether it is in the interests of justice to authorise publication of the juvenile offender's name under s 11(4B) of the Children (Criminal Proceedings) Act 1987."]

Ratio Decidendi

The Crown did not establish that publishing the offender's name was in the interests of justice or that the interests of justice outweighed the potential prejudice to the offender. The general legislative intent is to protect juveniles' identities to aid their rehabilitation and reintegration. None of the Crown's arguments justified departing from that intent in this case.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • ["The application to authorise publication of the offender's name is refused."]