R v Khalid [2015] NSWSC 1561
The trial date was vacated because the Crown conceded that substantial disclosure material was served too close to the trial date to afford the accused's counsel a proper opportunity to review it and seek instructions, and proceeding otherwise would have denied the accused a fair trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application to Vacate Trial Date
- Outcome
- Application to vacate trial date granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['practice and Procedure' 'disclosure Obligations' 'vacating Trial Date']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application to Vacate Trial Date
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the late disclosure by the Crown deprived the accused's representatives of a reasonable opportunity to consider material and obtain instructions, justifying vacation of the trial date"]
Ratio Decidendi
The trial date was vacated because the Crown conceded that substantial disclosure material was served too close to the trial date to afford the accused's counsel a proper opportunity to review it and seek instructions, and proceeding otherwise would have denied the accused a fair trial.
Court Disposition
Application to vacate trial date granted.
Orders
- ['The trial date of 2 November 2015 is vacated.' 'The matter is listed before Johnson J, the arraignments judge, on 6 November 2015 at 10am.' 'The accused is to attend by way of audio-visual link before Johnson J on that day.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment