Bitekiteku & Ors v P & ND & Ors [2002] NSWIRComm 83
The applicants were ordered to provide further and better particulars in respect of specified paragraphs of their amended summons, as the particulars currently provided were open-ended and insufficient for the third respondent to understand and respond to the case it must meet. The guiding principles come from the authorities on particulars which require particulars to be sufficiently clear on material facts but not on evidence, and that the degree of particularity depends on the nature of the case.
- Parties
- First Applicant / Respondent on Notice of Motion: Bitekiteku Pty Ltd; Second Applicant / Respondent on Notice of Motion: Stephen James Colwell; Second Applicant / Respondent on Notice of Motion: Kim Joy Colwell; Third Respondent / Applicant on Notice of Motion: Pure & Natural Australia Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Interlocutory Judgment on Notice of Motion for Further and Better Particulars
- Outcome
- Further and better particulars ordered
- Legal Topics
- Practice and Procedure, Particulars, Unfair Contracts, Franchise Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bitekiteku Pty Ltd
First Applicant / Respondent on Notice of Motion
Stephen James Colwell
Second Applicant / Respondent on Notice of Motion
Kim Joy Colwell
Second Applicant / Respondent on Notice of Motion
Pure & Natural Australia Pty Ltd
Third Respondent / Applicant on Notice of Motion
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 / Interlocutory Judgment on Notice of Motion for Further and Better Particulars
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether further and better particulars should be ordered in respect of the applicants' amended summons seeking relief under s 106 of the Industrial Relations Act 1996
- 2 Principles guiding orders for particulars in proceedings of this kind
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants were ordered to provide further and better particulars in respect of specified paragraphs of their amended summons, as the particulars currently provided were open-ended and insufficient for the third respondent to understand and respond to the case it must meet. The guiding principles come from the authorities on particulars which require particulars to be sufficiently clear on material facts but not on evidence, and that the degree of particularity depends on the nature of the case.
Court Disposition
Further and better particulars ordered
Orders
- The applicants shall provide the further particulars required by this judgment to the third respondent within 14 days of today, subject to the need to supplement any particulars following discovery.
- Costs are reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment