R v Johnson (No 3) [2017] NSWSC 572
The Prasad invitation was refused because the judge did not assess the Crown case as weak. The evidence was considered strong that the accused was the assailant, strong as to the mental element for murder, and sufficient for the jury to infer as a matter of common sense that the assault substantially contributed to the deceased's death despite possible other contributing factors.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Trial for Murder / Application for a Prasad Invitation at the Close of the Crown Case
- Outcome
- Application for Prasad invitation rejected.
- Legal Topics
- ['prasad Invitation' 'murder' 'homicide' 'causation' 'identification Evidence' 'intent to Inflict Grievous Bodily Harm']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Trial for Murder / Application for a Prasad Invitation at the Close of the Crown Case
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the jury should be invited, in accordance with R v Prasad, to consider acquittal at the close of the Crown case.' 'Whether the Crown case was weak in relation to identification of the accused as the assailant.' 'Whether the Crown case was weak in relation to the mental element for murder.' 'Whether the Crown case was weak in relation to causation of death.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Prasad invitation was refused because the judge did not assess the Crown case as weak. The evidence was considered strong that the accused was the assailant, strong as to the mental element for murder, and sufficient for the jury to infer as a matter of common sense that the assault substantially contributed to the deceased's death despite possible other contributing factors.
Court Disposition
Application for Prasad invitation rejected.
Orders
- ['The application to invite the jury to consider acquittal at this stage on any basis with regard to any count upon the indictment is not accepted.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment