Elanor Funds Management Limited v Alceon Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] FCA 340
Justice between the parties is achieved by awarding the applicant 25% of its costs, given the success in categories of documents, important concessions by respondents, and some limitation achieved by respondents as to scope.
- Parties
- Prospective Applicant: Elanor Funds Management Limited; Prospective First Respondent: Alceon Group Pty Ltd; Prospective Second Respondent: CPRAM Investments Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Preliminary Discovery / Disposition of Reserved Costs Following Successful Application
- Outcome
- Partially in favour of applicant; costs partially awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Preliminary Discovery, Costs Orders, Scope of Discovery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elanor Funds Management Limited
Prospective Applicant
Alceon Group Pty Ltd
Prospective First Respondent
CPRAM Investments Pty Ltd
Prospective Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Preliminary Discovery / Disposition of Reserved Costs Following Successful Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded to the applicant and in what proportion following preliminary discovery application under rule 7.23
- 2 Whether scope of documents for discovery was appropriately limited
Ratio Decidendi
Justice between the parties is achieved by awarding the applicant 25% of its costs, given the success in categories of documents, important concessions by respondents, and some limitation achieved by respondents as to scope.
Court Disposition
Partially in favour of applicant; costs partially awarded.
Orders
- The prospective first respondent pay 25% of the prospective applicant's costs of and incidental to the application.
- Orders and reasons are made and published from Chambers pursuant to s 23 and s 37P of Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 and rules 1.32 and 1.36 of Federal Court Rules 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment