Melbourne Home of Ford Pty Ltd & Ors v Trade Practices Commission & Anor [1979] FCA 25

Melbourne Home of Ford Pty Ltd & Ors v Trade Practices Commission & Anor [1979] FCA 25

Section 155 of the Trade Practices Act 1974, through clear statutory language, abrogates the common law privilege against self-incrimination in respect of compelled compliance with notices to furnish information or produce documents, including where compliance may expose to liability for a pecuniary penalty for contravention of the Act, not just crimes. The statutory condition that the Commission Chairman have 'reason to believe' is a condition precedent satisfied by regularity of the notice on its face; factual inquiry into the sufficiency of the Chairman’s belief will only be permitted where bona fides are credibly impugned. Discovery or interrogatories to challenge the validity of the...

Parties
Applicants: Melbourne Home of Ford Pty Ltd & Ors; Respondents: Trade Practices Commission and Ronald Moore Panurma
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 March 1979
Procedural Posture
Special Case Stated for Full Court; Proceedings Under Trade Practices Act 1974 S.163 a Seeking Declarations / Full Federal Court Decision, Answers to Stated Legal Questions
Outcome
Questions (i), (ii), (iii), (v) answered Yes; questions (vi) answered No; questions (iv), (vii), (viii), (ix) not answered. Proceedings stood over for argument on costs.
Legal Topics
Privilege Against Self Incrimination, Compulsory Production of Documents, Statutory Interpretation of S.155 Trade Practices Act 1974, Scope of Commission Investigatory Powers
Trade Practices Administrative Law Privilege Against Self Incrimination Compulsory Production of Documents Statutory Interpretation of S.155 Trade Practices Act 1974 Scope of Commission Investigatory Powers

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Melbourne Home of Ford Pty Ltd & Ors

Applicants

Trade Practices Commission and Ronald Moore Panurma

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Special Case Stated for Full Court; Proceedings Under Trade Practices Act 1974 S.163 a Seeking Declarations / Full Federal Court Decision, Answers to Stated Legal Questions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether s.155 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 abrogates common law privilege against self-incrimination with respect to pecuniary penalty proceedings under the Act
  2. 2 Whether a person/company suspected of contraventions can be compelled to answer questions or produce documents under s.155
  3. 3 Whether information or documents can be required to be produced other than at place of business or to persons other than the Commission

Ratio Decidendi

Section 155 of the Trade Practices Act 1974, through clear statutory language, abrogates the common law privilege against self-incrimination in respect of compelled compliance with notices to furnish information or produce documents, including where compliance may expose to liability for a pecuniary penalty for contravention of the Act, not just crimes. The statutory condition that the Commission Chairman have 'reason to believe' is a condition precedent satisfied by regularity of the notice on its face; factual inquiry into the sufficiency of the Chairman’s belief will only be permitted where bona fides are credibly impugned. Discovery or interrogatories to challenge the validity of the...

Court Disposition

Questions (i), (ii), (iii), (v) answered Yes; questions (vi) answered No; questions (iv), (vii), (viii), (ix) not answered. Proceedings stood over for argument on costs.

Orders

  • Answers to questions (i), (ii), (iii), (v): Yes.
  • Answers to question (vi): No.