Golding v O’Ryan [2019] NSWCA 259
The applicants were not denied procedural fairness as all relevant submissions had been made in writing and considered by the primary judge; there was no error in the judge's reliance on a concession or in the timing thereof; ample opportunity for resolution between the parties had been provided, justifying the winding up order and the refusal to extend its stay.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Appellate; Leave Application
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['procedural Fairness' 'company Winding Up' 'deadlock' 'stay of Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Appellate; Leave Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the primary judge denied procedural fairness by precluding the applicants from making submissions on identified topics' 'Whether the primary judge proceeded on the basis that a concession had been made on behalf of the Goldings before the winding up order was made' 'Whether the primary judge should have extended a stay of the winding up orders due to lack of substantial opportunity to resolve differences']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants were not denied procedural fairness as all relevant submissions had been made in writing and considered by the primary judge; there was no error in the judge's reliance on a concession or in the timing thereof; ample opportunity for resolution between the parties had been provided, justifying the winding up order and the refusal to extend its stay.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment