BANNISTER v WALTON and ANOR [1996] NSWCA 42
A fair minded and informed observer, knowing only that Dr Ellis was a member of the Australian Orthopaedic Association (which had sought to remove the claimant) but without evidence of his involvement in those attempts, would not reasonably apprehend bias or lack of impartiality in Dr Ellis's participation in the Tribunal.
- Parties
- Claimant: John Herbert Bannister; First Opponent: Merrilyn Walton; Second Opponent: Medical Tribunal (appointed under s32M Medical Practitioners Act 1938); Third Opponent: New South Wales Medical Board
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Application to Quash Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Procedural Fairness, Bias in Statutory Tribunals, Certiorari, Medical Practitioners Discipline
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Herbert Bannister
Claimant
Merrilyn Walton
First Opponent
Medical Tribunal (appointed under s32M Medical Practitioners Act 1938)
Second Opponent
New South Wales Medical Board
Third Opponent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Application to Quash Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether presence of Dr Ellis on the Tribunal gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias warranting quashing the Tribunal's decision
Ratio Decidendi
A fair minded and informed observer, knowing only that Dr Ellis was a member of the Australian Orthopaedic Association (which had sought to remove the claimant) but without evidence of his involvement in those attempts, would not reasonably apprehend bias or lack of impartiality in Dr Ellis's participation in the Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Summons dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment