Lewis v Commissioner of Police [2023] NSWIRComm 1117

Lewis v Commissioner of Police [2023] NSWIRComm 1117

Categories of the summons to produce that are broad, vague, or lack apparent relevance are set aside, while categories that demonstrate apparent relevance and legitimate forensic purpose are ordered to be produced.

Parties
Applicant on Motion, Respondent in Substantive Matter: Commissioner of Police; Respondent on Motion, Applicant in Substantive Matter: Julie-Ann Lewis
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
04 December 2023
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of Removal From NSW Police Force / Procedural Motion to Set Aside Summons to Produce
Outcome
Summons to produce set aside in part; production ordered in part.
Legal Topics
Procedure and Powers, Summons to Produce, Apparent Relevance, Forensic Purpose, Discovery

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Commissioner of Police

Applicant on Motion, Respondent in Substantive Matter

Julie-Ann Lewis

Respondent on Motion, Applicant in Substantive Matter

Procedural Posture

Application for Review of Removal From NSW Police Force / Procedural Motion to Set Aside Summons to Produce

  1. 1 Whether categories of the summons to produce should be set aside or enforced based on apparent relevance and legitimate forensic purpose

Ratio Decidendi

Categories of the summons to produce that are broad, vague, or lack apparent relevance are set aside, while categories that demonstrate apparent relevance and legitimate forensic purpose are ordered to be produced.

Court Disposition

Summons to produce set aside in part; production ordered in part.

Orders

  • Set aside the Summons to produce with respect to categories 13, 33, 34, 35, 36 and 37.
  • Order production of categories 12, 38 and 39 by 4pm Thursday 7 December 2023.