Unlimited Business Consultants (Qld) Pty Ltd ACN 098 523 490 v Commissioner, Australian Federal Police [2003] FCA 707

The application for leave to appeal was refused because the proceeding concerned interlocutory relief, the applicants had failed primarily through inability to demonstrate any substantial detriment, and in those circumstances there were virtually no prospects of success on an appeal from the refusal of interlocutory relief.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 17 June 2003
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Relief; Leave to Appeal From Refusal of Interlocutory Relief
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal refused.
Legal Topics: ['proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (cth) S 227' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Relief' 'substantial Detriment' 'costs']

['proceeds of Crime' 'civil Procedure'] ['proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (cth) S 227' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Relief' 'substantial Detriment' 'costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory Relief; Leave to Appeal From Refusal of Interlocutory Relief

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the refusal of interlocutory relief.' 'Whether the applicants demonstrated substantial detriment sufficient to support interlocutory relief.' 'Whether the proper construction of s 227 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) should be tested in this application.']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused.

Orders

['The application for leave to appeal be refused.' "The applicants pay the respondents' costs of these proceedings."]