Mark Christopher Gibbins [1994] NSWLST 12
The Tribunal found the solicitor's actions to be disgraceful and dishonourable, amounting to professional misconduct by submitting a document with a false date and misleading the Law Society. The severity of the misconduct warranted a substantial fine but did not require removal from the Roll or suspension, given the solicitor's character and previous history.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Professional Misconduct Complaint / Final Determination and Orders
- Outcome
- Guilty of professional misconduct; monetary penalty imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['professional Misconduct' 'forgery' 'false Statement' 'misleading Law Society']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Professional Misconduct Complaint / Final Determination and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Did the solicitor submit a document for stamping which he knew bore a false date?' 'Did the solicitor mislead the Law Society by making false statements?']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found the solicitor's actions to be disgraceful and dishonourable, amounting to professional misconduct by submitting a document with a false date and misleading the Law Society. The severity of the misconduct warranted a substantial fine but did not require removal from the Roll or suspension, given the solicitor's character and previous history.
Court Disposition
Guilty of professional misconduct; monetary penalty imposed
Orders
- ['The solicitor pay a fine of $12,000 within sixty days.' "In default of compliance with the fine, the solicitor's practising certificate be cancelled and reinstated only upon compliance." 'The solicitor pay the costs of the Society, assessed on a solicitor and client basis as if taxed in the Supreme Court.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment