NASSER v MISZALSKI AND 1 OR [2001] NSWSC 848

NASSER v MISZALSKI AND 1 OR [2001] NSWSC 848

The appeal was dismissed because the Plaintiff did not show that the prosecution was initiated without reasonable cause or that exceptional circumstances justified an award of professional costs. On Senior Constable Ennever's account, the Plaintiff's conduct could reasonably be regarded as offensive, and the prosecution was justified in bringing the matter to trial despite the Plaintiff's solicitors' representations. The statutory preconditions in s81(4) of the Justices Act were therefore not established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 September 2001
Procedural Posture
Appeal From a Local Court Decision Refusing to Award Costs After Dismissal of a Summary Offences Act Charge for No Prima Facie Case / Supreme Court Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; the Plaintiff must pay the Defendants' costs.
Legal Topics
['professional Costs After Dismissal of Charge' 'proceedings Initiated Without Reasonable Cause' 'exceptional Circumstances for Costs' 'offensive Manner in a Public Place' 'lawful Authority Defence']
['criminal Procedure' 'costs' 'summary Offences' 'administrative Law / Judicial Review'] ['professional Costs After Dismissal of Charge' 'proceedings Initiated Without Reasonable Cause' 'exceptional Circumstances for Costs' 'offensive Manner in a Public Place' 'lawful Authority Defence']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From a Local Court Decision Refusing to Award Costs After Dismissal of a Summary Offences Act Charge for No Prima Facie Case / Supreme Court Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Magistrate erred in refusing to award professional costs under s81 of the Justices Act after finding no prima facie case on the offensive behaviour charge.' 'Whether the proceedings were initiated without reasonable cause or in bad faith, or conducted improperly, within s81(4)(b) of the Justices Act.' "Whether continuation of the prosecution after correspondence from the Plaintiff's solicitors constituted exceptional circumstances under s81(4)(d) of the Justices Act." 'Whether s12 of the Summary Offences Act 1988 provided a complete answer to the charge on the basis that the Plaintiff was engaged in lawful conduct.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the Plaintiff did not show that the prosecution was initiated without reasonable cause or that exceptional circumstances justified an award of professional costs. On Senior Constable Ennever's account, the Plaintiff's conduct could reasonably be regarded as offensive, and the prosecution was justified in bringing the matter to trial despite the Plaintiff's solicitors' representations. The statutory preconditions in s81(4) of the Justices Act were therefore not established.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; the Plaintiff must pay the Defendants' costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal to this Court is dismissed.' "The Plaintiff must pay the Defendant's costs."]