Francis William Bannister [1990] NSWLST 7

Francis William Bannister [1990] NSWLST 7

The Solicitor dishonestly and deceitfully misled his client and retained $3,000 from a Compensation Court award under the guise of costs, concealing the destination of the funds and using them for his own purposes. The four grounds were proved and constituted professional misconduct. However, in light of the Solicitor's concessions, contrition, character evidence, support from his partners, absence of previous or subsequent complaints, and the Tribunal's view that he remained fit to practise, cancellation or suspension was not necessary unless the fine was unpaid; a heavy pecuniary penalty and costs orders were appropriate.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 October 1990
Procedural Posture
Professional Misconduct Disciplinary Complaint Pursuant to Section 135 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 / Determination and Orders After Hearing
Outcome
Professional misconduct found on each of the four grounds; Solicitor fined $10,000, with suspension to operate if the fine was not paid within one month, and ordered to pay the Law Society's costs.
Legal Topics
['professional Misconduct' 'misleading a Client' 'dishonesty' 'wilful Breach of a Court Order' 'retention of Costs From Compensation Award' 'fitness to Practise' 'pecuniary Penalty']
['legal Profession' 'professional Discipline' 'workers Compensation'] ['professional Misconduct' 'misleading a Client' 'dishonesty' 'wilful Breach of a Court Order' 'retention of Costs From Compensation Award' 'fitness to Practise' 'pecuniary Penalty']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Professional Misconduct Disciplinary Complaint Pursuant to Section 135 of the Legal Profession Act 1987 / Determination and Orders After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Solicitor wilfully breached Section 42(2) of the Legal Practitioners Act 1898.' 'Whether the Solicitor wilfully misled his client about costs.' 'Whether the Solicitor breached Section 56(2) of the Workers Compensation Act 1926 by deducting costs from a compensation award.' 'Whether the Solicitor retained from a Compensation Court award an amount for costs to which he was not entitled.' 'Whether the misconduct showed unfitness to practise or warranted a lesser disciplinary response.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Solicitor dishonestly and deceitfully misled his client and retained $3,000 from a Compensation Court award under the guise of costs, concealing the destination of the funds and using them for his own purposes. The four grounds were proved and constituted professional misconduct. However, in light of the Solicitor's concessions, contrition, character evidence, support from his partners, absence of previous or subsequent complaints, and the Tribunal's view that he remained fit to practise, cancellation or suspension was not necessary unless the fine was unpaid; a heavy pecuniary penalty and costs orders were appropriate.

Court Disposition

Professional misconduct found on each of the four grounds; Solicitor fined $10,000, with suspension to operate if the fine was not paid within one month, and ordered to pay the Law Society's costs.

Orders

  • ['That Francis William Bannister be fined the sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000).' 'That the said sum be paid within one month from the date of this order and that thereafter the Solicitor be suspended from practice until the said fine be paid.' 'That the Solicitor pay the costs of the Law Society such costs to...