Peter Countouris [1996] NSWLST 13

Peter Countouris [1996] NSWLST 13

The solicitor engaged in a course of conduct amounting to serious professional misconduct by altering documents after execution, inserting false dates, misleading the Law Society, and procuring others to provide false evidence. Although similar to conduct in the Foreman case, the Tribunal drew distinctions based on the solicitor's frankness, contrition, and character, deciding that complete removal from the roll was not warranted. Instead, the seriousness was marked by a public reprimand, a substantial fine, cancellation of the practising certificate, and further restrictions.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 December 1996
Procedural Posture
Professional Disciplinary Proceedings / Final Decision and Orders
Outcome
Solicitor found guilty of professional misconduct; not struck off but subject to serious sanctions.
Legal Topics
['professional Misconduct' 'false Statement' 'misleading Conduct' 'falsification of Documents']
['legal Profession Law' 'professional Discipline'] ['professional Misconduct' 'false Statement' 'misleading Conduct' 'falsification of Documents']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Professional Disciplinary Proceedings / Final Decision and Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the solicitor was guilty of professional misconduct by inserting false dates and clauses into legal documents and misleading the Law Society' 'Whether the conduct warranted removal from the roll or another disciplinary sanction']

Ratio Decidendi

The solicitor engaged in a course of conduct amounting to serious professional misconduct by altering documents after execution, inserting false dates, misleading the Law Society, and procuring others to provide false evidence. Although similar to conduct in the Foreman case, the Tribunal drew distinctions based on the solicitor's frankness, contrition, and character, deciding that complete removal from the roll was not warranted. Instead, the seriousness was marked by a public reprimand, a substantial fine, cancellation of the practising certificate, and further restrictions.

Court Disposition

Solicitor found guilty of professional misconduct; not struck off but subject to serious sanctions.

Orders

  • ['Solicitor be publicly reprimanded.' 'Solicitor must pay a fine of $20,000.00 within 3 months.' "Solicitor's practising certificate cancelled." 'No practising certificate to be issued for 2 years.' 'During cancellation, solicitor must not engage in legal practice without written consent of the Society.' 'Solicitor...