Sheahan, in the matter of Atsikbasis Nominees Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) (No 5) [2013] FCA 1214
Clause 1.6 of the Deed of Settlement provides a holiday from all general interest charges during the period from January 2007 to the date of default, thus the correct amount of the Commissioner's proof of debt is $1,261,398.96. Costs are to be paid by the Commissioner from 11 October 2013.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Liquidation Proceeding/interlocutory Appeal / Ruling on Separate Questions and Appeal Against Liquidator's Decision
- Outcome
- The appeal against the liquidator’s decision is allowed. The Commissioner's proof of debt is to be admitted in the sum of $1,261,398.96. Costs orders against the Commissioner are made from 11 October 2013. Liberty to apply for further costs within 28 days.
- Legal Topics
- ['proof of Debt' 'general Interest Charge' 'construction of Deed' 'separate Questions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Liquidation Proceeding/interlocutory Appeal / Ruling on Separate Questions and Appeal Against Liquidator's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Proper construction of clause 1.6 of the Deed of Settlement regarding holiday from general interest charge (GIC)' "Correct amount to be admitted for the Commissioner's proof of debt" 'Appropriate costs orders']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 1.6 of the Deed of Settlement provides a holiday from all general interest charges during the period from January 2007 to the date of default, thus the correct amount of the Commissioner's proof of debt is $1,261,398.96. Costs are to be paid by the Commissioner from 11 October 2013.
Court Disposition
The appeal against the liquidator’s decision is allowed. The Commissioner's proof of debt is to be admitted in the sum of $1,261,398.96. Costs orders against the Commissioner are made from 11 October 2013. Liberty to apply for further costs within 28 days.
Orders
- ['The requirement in Rule 30.01(2) be dispensed with.' 'Separate question(s) heard: Is the second plaintiff liable to the Commissioner for GIC from 8 January 2007 to the default under the Deed of Settlement? (No); and if not, is liability at statutory or concessional rate? (Concessional rate).' 'The Commissioner of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment