Charles Parsons & Co Pty Ltd v Express Publications Pty Ltd; Express Publications Pty Ltd v Charles Parsons & Co Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1031

Charles Parsons & Co Pty Ltd v Express Publications Pty Ltd; Express Publications Pty Ltd v Charles Parsons & Co Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1031

The spreadsheets were not received under s 50 because the evidence did not establish that they were true summaries of identified underlying documents: one spreadsheet appeared to include material not found in the Master Reports and to involve judgment or assumptions to advance a contention about stock being more than 6 months old, while other spreadsheets did not identify with sufficient precision the records from which they were derived. The spreadsheets were also not receivable as business records absent evidence that they were prepared in the ordinary course of business rather than for the proceedings.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Equity Commercial List; Procedural and Other Rulings / Ex Tempore Judgment on Evidentiary Objections to Tender of Spreadsheet Summaries
Outcome
Tender of summaries rejected
Legal Topics
['proof of Voluminous or Complex Documents' 'summaries Under S 50 of the Evidence Act 1995 (nsw)' 'business Records' 'affidavit Evidence' 'evidentiary Objections']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Equity Commercial List; Procedural and Other Rulings / Ex Tempore Judgment on Evidentiary Objections to Tender of Spreadsheet Summaries

  1. 1 ['Whether spreadsheets prepared by Ms Screpis were receivable as business records under s 69 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).' 'Whether the spreadsheets were receivable as summaries under s 50 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW).' 'Whether the spreadsheets merely summarised underlying documents or involved interpretation, judgment, assumptions, or submissions.' 'Whether the evidence identified with sufficient precision the documents purportedly summarised.']

Ratio Decidendi

The spreadsheets were not received under s 50 because the evidence did not establish that they were true summaries of identified underlying documents: one spreadsheet appeared to include material not found in the Master Reports and to involve judgment or assumptions to advance a contention about stock being more than 6 months old, while other spreadsheets did not identify with sufficient precision the records from which they were derived. The spreadsheets were also not receivable as business records absent evidence that they were prepared in the ordinary course of business rather than for the proceedings.

Court Disposition

Tender of summaries rejected

Orders

  • ["The spreadsheet referred to at par 42 of Ms Screpis's affidavit was rejected under s 50 of the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)." "The first two sentences of par 42, the third and following sentences in par 45, and all of par 46 of Ms Screpis's affidavit were rejected." "The spreadsheets referred to in pars 75 and 76 of Ms...