FOTHERINGHAM V FOTHERINGHAM [1998] NSWCA 83
The Court held that the Master erred in the assessment of the parties' respective contributions and misunderstood the proper valuation and evidence relating to the property and finances. The appropriate adjustment under the Act was determined to be 25% of the net value of the property at separation, resulting in an award of $90,000 to the respondent.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Fotheringham; Respondent/plaintiff: Fotheringham
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed, orders varied
- Legal Topics
- Property Adjustment, De Facto Relationships, Contributions Assessment, Costs Orders, Offers of Compromise
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fotheringham
Appellant/defendant
Fotheringham
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Master erred in the assessment of contributions and the exercise of discretion under the De Facto Relationships Act 1984
- 2 Appropriate quantum of property adjustment
- 3 Application of s18(1) time limits to periods of cohabitation
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the Master erred in the assessment of the parties' respective contributions and misunderstood the proper valuation and evidence relating to the property and finances. The appropriate adjustment under the Act was determined to be 25% of the net value of the property at separation, resulting in an award of $90,000 to the respondent.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed, orders varied
Orders
- Order that the appeal be allowed
- Order that O1 and O2 made by the Master on 19 November 1996 be set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment