Inspector Nicholson v Pymble No 1 Pty Ltd [2010] NSWIRComm 79
It is impermissible for the Court to determine a strike out (dismissal) motion in the absence of an appropriate factual basis established by admissible evidence. As the application was not supported by properly adduced evidence, the defendants' application must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Occupational Health and Safety Prosecution / Interlocutory Application (strike Out Motion)
- Outcome
- Application to dismiss proceedings dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['prosecution Under S 10 and S 10(1) by Virtue of S 26 of the Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000' 'strike Out Application' 'control of Premises' 'evidentiary Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Occupational Health and Safety Prosecution / Interlocutory Application (strike Out Motion)
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the defendants' application to dismiss (strike out) the proceedings should be granted for lack of evidence" 'Whether there is sufficient evidence as to control of premises by the corporate defendant under s 10 of the Act']
Ratio Decidendi
It is impermissible for the Court to determine a strike out (dismissal) motion in the absence of an appropriate factual basis established by admissible evidence. As the application was not supported by properly adduced evidence, the defendants' application must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application to dismiss proceedings dismissed
Orders
- ["Defendants' application to dismiss the proceedings is dismissed." 'Costs are reserved.' 'Proceedings set down for hearing for five days from 25 October 2010 at 10am.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment