SZKDL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 161

SZKDL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 161

The appeal was dismissed because the relocation ground identified no error of law, the proposed new grounds concerning future persecution and s 424A had no prospects of success and leave to rely on them was refused, the Tribunal had considered the appellant's claims and rejected them on credibility grounds, reliance on country information fell within s 424A(3)(a), and there was no support for any allegation that the Federal Magistrate acted in bad faith or denied natural justice.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 February 2008
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal Concerning Protection Visas and Judicial Review / Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['protection Visas' 'refugee Review Tribunal Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'relocation' 'country Information' 'bad Faith' 'leave to Raise New Grounds on Appeal']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visas' 'refugee Review Tribunal Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'relocation' 'country Information' 'bad Faith' 'leave to Raise New Grounds on Appeal']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal Concerning Protection Visas and Judicial Review / Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Federal Magistrate erred in dismissing the application for judicial review of the Refugee Review Tribunal decision.' 'Whether the Tribunal made a jurisdictional error in finding relocation was reasonable and feasible.' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to decide the real question of whether there was a real chance of persecution in the future.' 'Whether the Tribunal breached s 424A(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) by using critical adverse information.' "Whether the Federal Magistrate's decision was not made in good faith or according to the rules of natural justice."]

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the relocation ground identified no error of law, the proposed new grounds concerning future persecution and s 424A had no prospects of success and leave to rely on them was refused, the Tribunal had considered the appellant's claims and rejected them on credibility grounds, reliance on country information fell within s 424A(3)(a), and there was no support for any allegation that the Federal Magistrate acted in bad faith or denied natural justice.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The appellants pay the costs of the first respondent fixed at $900.']