AFT18 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 876
The primary judge did consider the claimed mistranslations or misinterpretations, but in the absence of any transcript or other evidence was not prepared to accept that they occurred. The appellants bore the onus of demonstrating jurisdictional error and did not do so; consequently no error was shown in the Federal Circuit Court judgment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judicial Review Concerning Refusal of Protection Visas / Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'procedural Fairness' 'mistranslation or Misinterpretation Before Tribunal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Findings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judicial Review Concerning Refusal of Protection Visas / Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the primary judge failed to consider the possibility of mistranslations or misinterpretations during the Tribunal hearing.' 'Whether the appellants established jurisdictional error based on alleged non-translations, mistranslations or misinterpretations in the absence of transcript or other evidence.']
Ratio Decidendi
The primary judge did consider the claimed mistranslations or misinterpretations, but in the absence of any transcript or other evidence was not prepared to accept that they occurred. The appellants bore the onus of demonstrating jurisdictional error and did not do so; consequently no error was shown in the Federal Circuit Court judgment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' "The appellants pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment