SZQBV v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1391
The appeal was dismissed because the judgment appealed from was interlocutory and leave to appeal had not been granted or justified; in any event, the grounds raised no prospect of success as they challenged factual findings of the Tribunal absent jurisdictional error and failed to demonstrate any legal error or substantial injustice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs ordered against appellants.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'appeal Requirements' 'interlocutory Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in refusing the protection visa by failing to consider persecution claims under s 91R of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether legal or factual errors were made by the Tribunal or Federal Magistrate' 'Whether leave to appeal from an interlocutory judgment was required and justified']
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the judgment appealed from was interlocutory and leave to appeal had not been granted or justified; in any event, the grounds raised no prospect of success as they challenged factual findings of the Tribunal absent jurisdictional error and failed to demonstrate any legal error or substantial injustice.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs ordered against appellants.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The appellants pay the costs of the first respondent.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment