SZFYM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 884

SZFYM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 884

The Federal Magistrate was correct, for the reasons his Honour gave, to dismiss the judicial review application concerning the applicants' protection visa decisions; any appeal would be doomed to fail, so the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 June 2007
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal in Migration Judicial Review Proceedings / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Judgment of a Federal Magistrate
Outcome
Application dismissed.
Legal Topics
['protection Visas' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'restrictions on Further Proceedings']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visas' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'restrictions on Further Proceedings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal in Migration Judicial Review Proceedings / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Judgment of a Federal Magistrate

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the Federal Magistrate's dismissal of an application for judicial review of decisions concerning the applicants' attempts to secure protection visas." 'Whether any further proceedings concerning the visa application or related administrative decisions or action should be accepted or continued without leave of the Court.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Federal Magistrate was correct, for the reasons his Honour gave, to dismiss the judicial review application concerning the applicants' protection visa decisions; any appeal would be doomed to fail, so the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The first applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $800.00." 'No further application for review of the decision of the delegate of the first respondent dated 8 May 2001, or for review of any other administrative decision or action by any person concerning the...