SZDPO & Ors v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 566
Because the applicants had already unsuccessfully challenged the Refugee Review Tribunal decision before the Federal Magistrates Court, the Federal Court and in a special leave application to the High Court, their further application merely re-agitated matters that were or might have been raised earlier and was properly dismissed as an abuse of process; no ground was shown for leave to appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrate's Decision Dismissing an Application as an Abuse of Process
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs fixed at $1000.00.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visas' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'abuse of Process' 'leave to Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrate's Decision Dismissing an Application as an Abuse of Process
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Magistrate's dismissal of the application as an abuse of process" "Whether the applicants' further application merely sought to re-agitate matters that were or might have been raised in earlier proceedings"]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the applicants had already unsuccessfully challenged the Refugee Review Tribunal decision before the Federal Magistrates Court, the Federal Court and in a special leave application to the High Court, their further application merely re-agitated matters that were or might have been raised earlier and was properly dismissed as an abuse of process; no ground was shown for leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs fixed at $1000.00.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed at $1000.00."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment