Four Seasons Gutter Protection Pty Ltd v Leafbusters Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] FCA 1402

Four Seasons Gutter Protection Pty Ltd v Leafbusters Pty Ltd (No 2) [2004] FCA 1402

The respondents committed serious and deliberate contempts by publishing slightly amended versions of an injuncted document, in circumstances involving recklessness, malice, continued publication despite demands and contempt proceedings, and conduct intended to damage Four Seasons. Substantial pecuniary penalties were required, with separate penalties for Leafbusters and Ms Tsioris because Leafbusters was not shown to be merely Ms Tsioris's alter ego. The total penalties were discounted for the one course of conduct, loss of interlocutory relief and costs liability, and the indemnity costs order. Imprisonment was not imposed because the Court accepted that the message had finally got...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 October 2004
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Application / Penalty and Costs Following Findings of Guilt on Five Charges of Contempt
Outcome
Leafbusters Pty Ltd and Theofani Tsioris were each ordered to pay penalties of $14,000 for contempt; delivery up and indemnity costs orders were made.
Legal Topics
['publication of Injuncted Document' 'civil Contempt Penalties' 'separate Penalties for Company and Individual Respondents' 'aggravating and Mitigating Factors' 'indemnity Costs' 'delivery Up of Documents']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Contempt of Court Application / Penalty and Costs Following Findings of Guilt on Five Charges of Contempt

  1. 1 ['What penalties should be imposed on Leafbusters Pty Ltd and Theofani Tsioris for five charges of contempt of court.' 'Whether separate penalties should be imposed on the company and the individual respondent.' 'Whether imprisonment should be imposed on Ms Tsioris.' 'Whether the respondents should deliver up copies of the Alert Alert documents.' 'What costs order should be made on the contempt application.']

Ratio Decidendi

The respondents committed serious and deliberate contempts by publishing slightly amended versions of an injuncted document, in circumstances involving recklessness, malice, continued publication despite demands and contempt proceedings, and conduct intended to damage Four Seasons. Substantial pecuniary penalties were required, with separate penalties for Leafbusters and Ms Tsioris because Leafbusters was not shown to be merely Ms Tsioris's alter ego. The total penalties were discounted for the one course of conduct, loss of interlocutory relief and costs liability, and the indemnity costs order. Imprisonment was not imposed because the Court accepted that the message had finally got...

Court Disposition

Leafbusters Pty Ltd and Theofani Tsioris were each ordered to pay penalties of $14,000 for contempt; delivery up and indemnity costs orders were made.

Orders

  • ['The first respondent pay the sum of $14,000 by way of penalty to the District Registrar, Victoria District Registry, Federal Court of Australia within 30 days.' 'The second respondent pay the sum of $14,000 by way of penalty to the District Registrar, Victoria District Registry, Federal Court of Australia within...