Crosbie and Bryant, in the matter of Australian Motor Finance Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) and Australian Motor Finance Corporate Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) [2009] FCA 707
The Court could not prospectively determine whether Michael O'Brien would have a reasonable excuse under s 597(6A) for failing to attend on a future date. On the evidence before the Court, Mr O'Brien did not discharge his onus of proving that his medical or psychological condition amounted to reasonable cause for failing to attend on 7 May 2009 or 25 May 2009. Although a warrant could have issued under r 11.10(2)(a), Mr O'Brien's counsel indicated that he would attend on 18 June 2009, so the Court adjourned the return of the summons, reserved the warrant question, and ordered him to pay the receivers' costs of the r 11.10 application.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Application Concerning Public Examinations Under S 596 a of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Application Under R 11.10 of the Federal Court (corporations) Rules 2000 (cth) Concerning Non Attendance at a Public Examination Summons
- Outcome
- Return of summons adjourned; question of warrant reserved; Michael O'Brien ordered to pay costs of the r 11.10 application.
- Legal Topics
- ['public Examinations' 'summons to Attend for Examination' 'reasonable Excuse or Reasonable Cause for Non Attendance' 'warrant for Arrest' 'receivers and Managers' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Application Concerning Public Examinations Under S 596 a of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Application Under R 11.10 of the Federal Court (corporations) Rules 2000 (cth) Concerning Non Attendance at a Public Examination Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Court could determine in advance whether Michael O'Brien would have a reasonable excuse under s 597(6A) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) if he did not attend on 18 June 2009." "Whether Michael O'Brien had reasonable cause under r 11.10(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) for failing to attend for public examination on 7 May 2009 or 25 May 2009." 'Whether a warrant should issue under r 11.10(2)(a) of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth).' 'What orders should be made as to the adjournment of the summons and costs.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court could not prospectively determine whether Michael O'Brien would have a reasonable excuse under s 597(6A) for failing to attend on a future date. On the evidence before the Court, Mr O'Brien did not discharge his onus of proving that his medical or psychological condition amounted to reasonable cause for failing to attend on 7 May 2009 or 25 May 2009. Although a warrant could have issued under r 11.10(2)(a), Mr O'Brien's counsel indicated that he would attend on 18 June 2009, so the Court adjourned the return of the summons, reserved the warrant question, and ordered him to pay the receivers' costs of the r 11.10 application.
Court Disposition
Return of summons adjourned; question of warrant reserved; Michael O'Brien ordered to pay costs of the r 11.10 application.
Orders
- ["The return of the summons addressed to Michael O'Brien, issued on 22 April 2009, is adjourned to 10.00 am on 18 June 2009." 'The question of the issue of a warrant pursuant to r 11.10(2)(a) of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) be reserved.' "Michael O'Brien pay the costs of the receivers and...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment