In the matter of ACN 004 410 833 Limited (formerly Arrium Limited) (subject to deed of company arrangement) & the companies listed in Schedule 1 to the Interlocutory Process [2018] NSWSC 747
The Court gave directions permitting access because the materials would facilitate identification and pursuit of potential causes of action available to the lenders, assist creditor committee members in consulting with the deed administrators about claims potentially available to a liquidator, promote informed decision-making in the administration, and avoid confining the lenders to inspection of the written record given the volume of documents and length of the examinations. There was no suggestion of improper purpose or abuse of process, and it was appropriate to limit use of documents produced by third parties under compulsion to the purposes of the proceeding.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 596 F(1)(e) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) for Directions About Access to Records of Public Examinations / Interlocutory Process Filed 17 May 2018; Reasons for Orders Made on 17 May 2018
- Outcome
- Disclosure of documents permitted, on terms.
- Legal Topics
- ['public Examinations' 'access to Records of Examination' 'deed of Company Arrangement' 'creditors' 'legal Professional Privilege']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 596 F(1)(e) of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) for Directions About Access to Records of Public Examinations / Interlocutory Process Filed 17 May 2018; Reasons for Orders Made on 17 May 2018
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should permit nominated creditors to access, uplift and copy documents marked for identification and/or produced to examinees during public examinations and transcripts of those examinations under s 596F(1)(e) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether access should be subject to limits on use of documents produced by third parties under compulsion.' 'Whether creditor access was justified by the facilitation of potential claims and consultation with deed administrators.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court gave directions permitting access because the materials would facilitate identification and pursuit of potential causes of action available to the lenders, assist creditor committee members in consulting with the deed administrators about claims potentially available to a liquidator, promote informed decision-making in the administration, and avoid confining the lenders to inspection of the written record given the volume of documents and length of the examinations. There was no suggestion of improper purpose or abuse of process, and it was appropriate to limit use of documents produced by third parties under compulsion to the purposes of the proceeding.
Court Disposition
Disclosure of documents permitted, on terms.
Orders
- ['Subject to order 2, pursuant to section 596F(1)(e) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the entities set out in Schedule 2 be permitted to access, uplift and make a copy of the bundles of documents marked "MFI-1" and "MFI-2" in the proceeding, any document or bundle of documents subsequently marked for...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment