Re Crown Employees Wages Staff (Rates of Pay) Award 2011 & Ors (No 3) [2013] NSWIRComm 109
On its proper construction, s 146C of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 and the Regulation require the Commission to give effect to the policy that public sector wage increases not exceed 2.5% per annum, but do not guarantee that increases of 2.5% must be awarded each year. The Commission retains a constrained discretion to award less than 2.5% when warranted on public interest grounds, such as significant economic or fiscal harm. In this case, no sufficient evidence was shown that an increase over 2.27% to 2.5% would cause real harm to the state's economy or public finances; thus, the awards should be varied to provide a 2.5% increase from 1 July 2013.
- Parties
- Party: Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union; Party: Australian Salaried Medical Officers' Federation (New South Wales); Party: Australian Workers Union NSW Branch; Party: Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (New South Wales Branch); Party: Electrical Trades Union, NSW Branch; Party: Fire Brigade Employees Union; Party: Health Services Union NSW; Party: Landcom; Party: NSW Ministry of Health; Party: NSW Nurses and Midwives Association; Party: NSW Teachers Federation; Party: Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales; Party: Secretary of the Treasury; Party: The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (NSW Branch); Party: Transport Workers' Union of New South Wales; Party: Unions NSW; Party: United Services Union; Party: United Voice; Party: Roads and Maritime Services
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Award Variation Applications—industrial Arbitration / Final Judgment Deciding Wage Increase for 12 Months From 1 July 2013
- Outcome
- Awards varied to provide a 2.5% increase in wages and relevant allowances from 1 July 2013. No finding for lower increase justified.
- Legal Topics
- Public Sector Wage Setting, Statutory Construction—industrial Relations Act 1996 (nsw), S 146 C, Industrial Awards—variation of Wages, Government Wage Policy, Role of Economic and Fiscal Considerations in Industrial Arbitration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union
Party
Australian Salaried Medical Officers' Federation (New South Wales)
Party
Australian Workers Union NSW Branch
Party
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (New South Wales Branch)
Party
Electrical Trades Union, NSW Branch
Party
Fire Brigade Employees Union
Party
Health Services Union NSW
Party
Landcom
Party
NSW Ministry of Health
Party
NSW Nurses and Midwives Association
Party
NSW Teachers Federation
Party
Public Service Association and Professional Officers' Association Amalgamated Union of New South Wales
Party
Secretary of the Treasury
Party
The Association of Professional Engineers, Scientists and Managers, Australia (NSW Branch)
Party
Transport Workers' Union of New South Wales
Party
Unions NSW
Party
United Services Union
Party
United Voice
Party
Roads and Maritime Services
Party
Procedural Posture
Award Variation Applications—industrial Arbitration / Final Judgment Deciding Wage Increase for 12 Months From 1 July 2013
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Relations Commission could award increases of less than 2.5% per annum in public sector wages on economic or fiscal grounds in light of s 146C and the Regulation under the Industrial Relations Act 1996
- 2 Whether economic and fiscal considerations justified limiting wage increases to 2.27%
- 3 Whether s 146C and the Regulation displaced or qualified the Commission's public interest role under ss 10, 17(3)(d), and 146
Ratio Decidendi
On its proper construction, s 146C of the Industrial Relations Act 1996 and the Regulation require the Commission to give effect to the policy that public sector wage increases not exceed 2.5% per annum, but do not guarantee that increases of 2.5% must be awarded each year. The Commission retains a constrained discretion to award less than 2.5% when warranted on public interest grounds, such as significant economic or fiscal harm. In this case, no sufficient evidence was shown that an increase over 2.27% to 2.5% would cause real harm to the state's economy or public finances; thus, the awards should be varied to provide a 2.5% increase from 1 July 2013.
Court Disposition
Awards varied to provide a 2.5% increase in wages and relevant allowances from 1 July 2013. No finding for lower increase justified.
Orders
- The awards that are the subject of these proceedings are to be varied to provide for an increase in wages and relevant allowances by 2.5 per cent from the beginning of the first pay period to commence on or after 1 July 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment