Advanced Communications Pty Ltd v Kooyoo Holdings Pty Ltd T/as The Codemaster Systems [2001] NSWSC 315
The magistrate did not find that there was no agreement at all, but that there was no agreement clearly setting out essential terms including recompense for Kooyoo; that finding was open on the evidence and was consistent with the agreed facts. In the absence of an agreed term as to recompense, it was appropriate to proceed on quantum meruit. The meeting, the 19 March 1997 letter, the absence of a response, the continued efforts by Kooyoo and Advanced Communications' continued possession and use of the equipment supported the conclusion that Advanced Communications was precluded from denying an obligation to make an appropriate payment. The estoppel did not determine the quantification or...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under S 69 of the Local Courts (civil Claims) Act 1970 From a Local Court Civil Claim / Supreme Court Appeal Judgment on a Question of Law Only
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['quantum Meruit' 'estoppel' 'appeal on Question of Law' 'software Supply Arrangement' 'damages Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 69 of the Local Courts (civil Claims) Act 1970 From a Local Court Civil Claim / Supreme Court Appeal Judgment on a Question of Law Only
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether it was open to the magistrate to find that there was never any agreement between the parties which made clear the terms of the working arrangement.' "Whether it was open to the magistrate to find that Advanced Communications was estopped from denying Kooyoo's claim to a quantum meruit." 'Whether, if quantum meruit was available, the damages awarded were excessive.']
Ratio Decidendi
The magistrate did not find that there was no agreement at all, but that there was no agreement clearly setting out essential terms including recompense for Kooyoo; that finding was open on the evidence and was consistent with the agreed facts. In the absence of an agreed term as to recompense, it was appropriate to proceed on quantum meruit. The meeting, the 19 March 1997 letter, the absence of a response, the continued efforts by Kooyoo and Advanced Communications' continued possession and use of the equipment supported the conclusion that Advanced Communications was precluded from denying an obligation to make an appropriate payment. The estoppel did not determine the quantification or...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment