Wonderland Business Park Pty. Ltd. & Anor. v. Hartford Lane Pty. Ltd. & Anor. [2001] NSWSC 86

The ex parte application for extension of caveat was refused due to lack of evidence or satisfactory explanation for bringing the application on the last day.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 23 February 2001
Procedural Posture: Application for Extension of Caveat / Ex Parte Application in Equity Division
Outcome: Ex parte application refused
Legal Topics: ['real Property' 'torrens System' 'caveat' 'lapsing Notice' 'extension of Caveat']

['property Law'] ['real Property' 'torrens System' 'caveat' 'lapsing Notice' 'extension of Caveat']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Caveat / Ex Parte Application in Equity Division

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether to grant an extension of the caveat on an ex parte application']

Ratio Decidendi

The ex parte application for extension of caveat was refused due to lack of evidence or satisfactory explanation for bringing the application on the last day.

Court Disposition

Ex parte application refused

Orders

['Short notice granted for return of the summons' 'Summons and supporting affidavits to be served on Minter Ellison Solicitors by 5pm or on defendants by 12 noon on 26 February 2001' 'Return of summons scheduled for 27 February 2001']