Sipad Holdings & Anor v Popovic, Nikola & Ors [1995] FCA 1075
As the applicants are prima facie entitled to the judgment and there is no sufficient ground to justify the continuation of the receivership pending appeal, and given the costs and lack of risk that the appeal will be rendered nugatory, the receiver's appointment should be terminated subject to appropriate conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Termination of Receiver
- Outcome
- Order to terminate receiver's appointment, subject to settling of appropriate conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['receivership' 'shareholder Disputes' 'interlocutory Relief' 'stays Pending Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application Regarding Termination of Receiver
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the receiver and manager of the sixth respondent should be withdrawn or his appointment terminated pending appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
As the applicants are prima facie entitled to the judgment and there is no sufficient ground to justify the continuation of the receivership pending appeal, and given the costs and lack of risk that the appeal will be rendered nugatory, the receiver's appointment should be terminated subject to appropriate conditions.
Court Disposition
Order to terminate receiver's appointment, subject to settling of appropriate conditions.
Orders
- []
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment