R v Haddad [2023] NSWDC 393
The reckless wounding and aggravated robbery with wounding offences were both within the mid-range of objective seriousness and involved knife violence, home settings, prior violent offending and offending while on conditional liberty. However, the Offender's early guilty plea, youth, profound deprived background, mental illness, drug addiction linked to that background, remorse, family support and reasonable rehabilitation prospects materially reduced moral culpability and justified a sentence that was not crushing. Applying totality and proportionality, and taking the Form 1 offence into account, the Court imposed an aggregate head sentence of 4 years and 6 months, backdated to 17...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Pleas of Guilty in the Local Court
- Outcome
- The Offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years and 6 months, with a non-parole period of 3 years commencing on 17 August 2022 and parole eligibility on 16 August 2025; he was referred to the Drug Court under s 18B of the Drug Court Act 2000.
- Legal Topics
- ['reckless Wounding' 'aggravated Robbery With Wounding/grievous Bodily Harm' 'dishonestly Obtain Property by Deception on Form 1' 'early Plea of Guilty' 'young Offender' 'prior Convictions' 'conditional Liberty' 'bugmy Principle' 'drug Addiction' 'mental Health' 'compulsory Drug Treatment Order Referral']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence / Sentence After Pleas of Guilty in the Local Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What aggregate sentence should be imposed for reckless wounding and aggravated robbery with wounding/grievous bodily harm, taking into account a Form 1 offence.' 'The objective seriousness of the reckless wounding and aggravated robbery offences.' "The effect of the Offender's early guilty plea, youth, deprived background, mental illness, drug addiction, prior convictions and offending while on conditional liberty." 'Whether the sentence should be backdated and whether special circumstances justified an extended parole period.' 'Whether the Offender should be referred to the Drug Court for consideration of a compulsory drug treatment order.']
Ratio Decidendi
The reckless wounding and aggravated robbery with wounding offences were both within the mid-range of objective seriousness and involved knife violence, home settings, prior violent offending and offending while on conditional liberty. However, the Offender's early guilty plea, youth, profound deprived background, mental illness, drug addiction linked to that background, remorse, family support and reasonable rehabilitation prospects materially reduced moral culpability and justified a sentence that was not crushing. Applying totality and proportionality, and taking the Form 1 offence into account, the Court imposed an aggregate head sentence of 4 years and 6 months, backdated to 17...
Court Disposition
The Offender was convicted and sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years and 6 months, with a non-parole period of 3 years commencing on 17 August 2022 and parole eligibility on 16 August 2025; he was referred to the Drug Court under s 18B of the Drug Court Act 2000.
Orders
- ['The Offender is sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years and 6 months.' 'The sentence is taken to commence on 17 August 2022.' 'The first date the Offender is eligible for parole is 16 August 2025.' 'Pursuant to s 18B of the Drug Court Act 2000 the Offender is referred to the Drug Court to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment